The Two Promising Technologies for Nuclear Fusion

Nuclear Series:

Global Producers  |  Nuclear Weapons Stockpiles  |  Fusion Technologies

History of Research into Fusion Reactors

The idea of harnessing nuclear fusion for electricity dates back to the 1950s, when scientists first began to explore the potential of fusion as a power source. In the decades that followed, researchers around the world conducted a series of experiments aimed at understanding the physics of fusion reactions and developing the technology needed to make fusion a practical power source.

In the 1970s and 1980s, magnetic confinement fusion became the dominant approach to fusion research, as scientists developed the tokamak design and demonstrated its potential to achieve the conditions required for sustained fusion reactions.

In the 1990s and 2000s, inertial confinement fusion also gained momentum as a promising approach to fusion research, as advances in laser and optics technology enabled the delivery of high-energy pulses to small fusion targets.

Today, magnetic confinement and inertial confinement fusion continue to be actively researched and developed, with multiple fusion experiments underway around the world aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of fusion as a power source. While significant technical challenges remain, scientists and engineers are optimistic that nuclear fusion will eventually become a practical and sustainable source of electricity.

Magnetic Confinement Versus Inertial Confinement Reactors

Magnetic confinement reactors have been the focus of fusion research for several decades and have made significant progress in demonstrating the feasibility of fusion as a power source. However, they still face technical challenges in achieving high plasma pressure and temperature required for sustained fusion reactions, as well as in designing and building a practical, scalable, and economically viable reactor.

Inertial confinement reactors, on the other hand, offer the potential for much higher reaction rates and energy densities, but face significant challenges in developing laser and optics systems capable of delivering the required energy to the fuel, as well as in overcoming issues with reproducibility and energy balance.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Magnetic Confinement Reactors

Benefits:

• Unlimited fuel: Magnetic confinement fusion uses hydrogen isotopes as fuel, which are abundant in the Earth’s ocean and do not produce long-lived radioactive waste.
• Clean energy: Magnetic confinement fusion produces almost no greenhouse gases or air pollutants, and generates only short-lived radioactive waste.
• High energy density: Magnetic confinement fusion reactions release a large amount of energy in a small volume, making it an attractive source of power for a variety of applications.

Drawbacks:

• Technical challenges: Magnetic confinement fusion is a highly complex and technically challenging field, requiring the development of advanced materials and technologies.
• High costs: The development and deployment of magnetic confinement fusion is expensive, requiring significant investment in research and development.
• Scale-up difficulties: Scaling up magnetic confinement fusion to commercial levels is a significant challenge, as it requires the development of larger and more efficient reactors.
• Plasma instabilities: Controlling the plasma in a magnetic confinement fusion reactor is challenging, as plasma instabilities can disrupt the reaction and lead to heat losses.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Inertial Confinement Reactors

Benefits:

• High energy density: Inertial confinement fusion reactions release a large amount of energy in a small volume, making it an attractive source of power for a variety of applications.
• Fuel versatility: Inertial confinement fusion can use a variety of fuels, including hydrogen isotopes and heavier elements, providing greater fuel flexibility.
• Short reaction time: Inertial confinement fusion reactions occur over very short time scales, making it possible to study high-energy-density physics.

Drawbacks:

• Technical challenges: Inertial confinement fusion is a highly complex and technically challenging field, requiring the development of advanced laser and optics technology.
• High costs: The development and deployment of inertial confinement fusion is expensive, requiring significant investment in research and development.
• Energy balance: Inertial confinement fusion requires a balance between the energy delivered to the fuel and the energy lost through thermal conduction, making it difficult to achieve ignition and sustainable reactions.
• Reproducibility: Inertial confinement fusion experiments can be highly dependent on specific conditions, making it difficult to reproduce results and attain consistent performance.

Sources:

https://science.howstuffworks.com/fusion-reactor.htm

Inertial Confinement Fusion: How to Make a Star, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

A Critical Comparison Between Magnetic and Inertial Confinement Schemes and Their Geometries

http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/kates-harbeck2/#:~:text=The%20two%20main%20issues%20are,and%20termination%20of%20the%20reaction.